That which can't be measured doesn't exist.
So how do we measure the value of talent? We talk about it all the time, but
it's an article of faith not hard science. If we can't prove that talent
has value, how can we hope to prove that recruiting contributes anything of
significance? In the absence of a useful answer, staffing cannot be a
strategic function. A survey by Accenture noted that Chief Executives
stated the ability to acquire talent as their #1 priority, but they also rated
staffing near the bottom among corporate functions for delivering on corporate
goals. What does staffing need to do to prove that what it brings to a company
has real value?
Morning
In the morning session we will work on clarifying the value of talent and
measuring the contributions of staffing. We'll debate metrics and more
fundamental questions such as “is staffing even worth evaluating?”
Afternoon
In the afternoon, we'll break up into groups of decision makers charged with
determining whether to outsource recruiting or not. What can be done to make
either choice more effective and likely to succeed (assuming we can define what
success means). Are there opportunities for innovation that can help?
Comments